2nd thretening letter.

2^nd Open Letter

Dear Mr Jarvis

I would like to make it clear and along the same tone of the first Open Letter sent to you that:

(That should read: ...along the same lines as... or ...in the same tone as... Is that actually what you meant to say Uncle Tom?)

   Any images copied and reproduced without       consent or permission from my personal     facebook webpage.

(All the images and pictures contained on all my social media mass communication public access websites which were not taken or captured by me were obtained by me BECAUSE those images and pictures were freely and publicly available on social media sites open to public access. Any person who desires to keep private the images and pictures of themselves which they have freely and un-coerced posted on social media websites SHOULD hide behind public access denied padlocks like good little girls and STOP bleating like a desperate Uncle Tom Prick black person BNP batty bwoy, and should stop lying under oath in court ..."all you have to do is right click and... I've since changed my setting now so that, but that ahh" ...Uncle Tom horseshit. 

 It is impossible to access photos of a person sorry I mean photos of an Uncle Tom Prick, if that person, sorry that twat, has NOT made the photo publicly available. That is why a certain Uncle Tom Prick's social media accounts have now completely disappeared all of a sudden like, from public view! Which is great pity and so so pathetic and pitiful. Still on the plus side all Colin Jarvis's social media content - including UTP and BNP twats photos - are all public and open to public scrutiny. 

 p.s. Happily I've got UTP in blue pullover (looking for all the world a gormless halfwit directly into camera) photo on my PC that was made publicly available, which I've still to use in due course. Unfortunately I didn't ...right click... on the publicly available - Uncle Tom Prick wearing wrap-around-sunglasses-indoors - photo before UTP's disappearing act. Shame that!

Used on a different website or any other web page and left open to public scrutiny and with matters dealt with privately, internally and in confidentiality.

    (What's the difference between a website a web page please Uncle Tom?) (Is that meant to read ...in confidence Uncle Tom?)

      Associated with foul, abusive, slanderous, defamatory or inflammatory language.

   (Please see my Twitter accounts and all my other social media
    websites. Personally speaking I find a BT/CWU Uncle Tom Prick black person ...foul )

Insinuation thereof, thus bringing me in keeping with unfounded allegations will also be met with the same repercussions. WHAT? 

 The above sentence, the above TRIPE, makes NO FUCKING SENSE AT ALL I'm afraid Uncle Tom.

Speculation: Was the author attempting to comes across as clev'a (sic) [like his BNP massa john wayne!] by trying to use what he thinks is legal sounding phrases and language? For fuck sake! Almost as sad  and hilarious as the spectacle of a black person's public humiliation everybody in court no.1 High Wycombe Law Courts witnessed on 11/7/13. No I take that back. Nothing can come close to being as funny as that day :-))

Which I now hasten to add will be swift and far reaching in its consequences for you should the offensive remarks and the image(s) used, not be removed with immediate effect.

(Questions: Is ...NO CASE TO ANSWER 

hasten to add ...enough for you? 

swift enough for you? 

far reaching in it's consequences enough for you? 

with immediate effect enough for you?

Sorry, I cannot obliged you with the ...be removed.. bit! 

You will have to stand, like a gormless fucking saddo in a public courtroom witness box AGAIN whilst being cheered on by your white rent-a-crowd "friends" if you want your Uncle Tom ...should the offensive remarks and the image(s) used, not be removed with immediate effect. (sic) Uncle Tom wish to come true.) p.s. Have you, UTP, 'informed' your courtroom white rent-a-crowd supporters exactly how you talk about white people when in the company of black people only?

No? No matter. I'll tell them for you.  

The following attachments have been added to clarify my issues.

(Please see ALL my existing public access social media mass communication websites for the complete content and images referred to above as ...my issues (sic)

(N.B. I have not altered any of the original text save deleting the christian and surname that was entered at the end of the Open Letter by the so so clev'a (sic) sender. The "Open Letter, very disappointingly, was NOT signed: John Coffey